A comparison between intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in the subarachnoid block for elective abdominal hysterectomy operations: A prospective, double-blind and randomized controlled study | Zendy

Debasish Bhar | Zendy; Sandip Roybasunia | Zendy; Amit Kumar Das | Zendy; SB Kundu | Zendy; RC Mondal | Zendy; PS Halder | Zendy; SK Mandal | Zendy; Sandip Chattopadhyay | Zendy

Open Access

A comparison between intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in the subarachnoid block for elective abdominal hysterectomy operations: A prospective, double-blind and randomized controlled study

Author(s) -

Debasish Bhar,

Sandip Roybasunia,

Amit Kumar Das,

SB Kundu,

RC Mondal,

PS Halder,

SK Mandal,

Sandip Chattopadhyay

Publication year - 2015

Publication title -

saudi journal of anaesthesia

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.416

H-Index - 24

eISSN - 1658-354X

pISSN - 0975-3125

DOI - 10.4103/1658-354x.168797

Subject(s) - medicine , neostigmine , bupivacaine , anesthesia , clonidine , nausea , vomiting , hysterectomy , randomized controlled trial , surgery , abdominal hysterectomy , intrathecal

Adjuvant to the local anesthetic agent has proven benefits when used intrathecally. With regards to intrathecal bupivacaine as control, we have compared in this study the effects of clonidine and neostigmine when co-administered intrathecally with hyperbaric (0.5%) bupivacaine for abdominal hysterectomy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom

About

About Careers Publisher Partners Contact Us Our institutional solutions Get Organisational Trial or Quote

Learn

FAQs Blog Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Download the Zendy App

Discover

Explore

Home ZAIA Blog