z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? A costing study in a trauma center in India
Author(s) -
Praveen Kumar,
Vishwanathan Jithesh,
Shakti Gupta
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
saudi journal of anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.416
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1658-354X
pISSN - 0975-3125
DOI - 10.4103/1658-354x.152883
Subject(s) - medicine , specialty , activity based costing , intensive care unit , context (archaeology) , intensive care , trauma center , health care , emergency medicine , neurosurgery , polytrauma , total cost , medical emergency , retrospective cohort study , intensive care medicine , family medicine , surgery , business , paleontology , accounting , marketing , economics , biology , economic growth
Though intensive care units (ICUs) only account for 10% of hospital beds, they consume nearly 22% of hospital resources. Few definitive costing studies have been conducted in Indian settings that would help determine appropriate resource allocation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here