Open AccessNoise exposure and cognitive performance: A study on personnel on board Royal Norwegian Navy vessels
Author(s) -
Kaja Irgens-Hansen,
Hilde Gundersen,
Erlend Sunde,
Valborg Baste,
Anette Harris,
Magne Bråtveit,
Bente E. Moen
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
noise and health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.344
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1998-4030
pISSN - 1463-1741
DOI - 10.4103/1463-1741.165057
Subject(s) - navy , alertness , noise (video) , workload , audiology , medicine , norwegian , effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance , noise exposure , cognition , test (biology) , psychology , hearing loss , computer science , psychiatry , linguistics , philosophy , archaeology , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , history , operating system , paleontology , biology
Prior research shows that work on board vessels of the Royal Norwegian Navy (RNoN) is associated with noise exposure levels above recommended standards. Further, noise exposure has been found to impair cognitive performance in environmental, occupational, and experimental settings, although prior research in naval and maritime settings is sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive performance after exposure to noise among personnel working on board vessels in the RNoN. Altogether 87 Navy personnel (80 men, 7 women; 31 ± 9 years) from 24 RNoN vessels were included. Noise exposure was recorded by personal noise dosimeters at a minimum of 4 h prior to testing, and categorized into 4 groups for the analysis: <72.6 dB(A), 72.6-77.0 dB(A), 77.1-85.2 dB(A), and >85.2 dB(A). The participants performed a visual attention test based on the Posner cue-target paradigm. Multivariable general linear model (GLM) analyses were performed to analyze whether noise exposure was associated with response time (RT) when adjusting for the covariates age, alertness, workload, noise exposure in test location, sleep the night before testing, use of hearing protection device (HPD), and percentage of errors. When adjusting for covariates, RT was significantly increased among personnel exposed to >85.2 dB(A) and 77.1-85.2 dB(A) compared to personnel exposed to <72.6 dB(A).