z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparing thaw survival, implantation and live birth rates from cryopreserved zygotes, embryos and blastocysts
Author(s) -
Mary Ellen Pavone,
Joy Innes,
Jennifer HirshfeldCytron,
Ralph R. Kazer,
Junyi Zhang
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of human reproductive sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.484
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 0974-1208
pISSN - 1998-4766
DOI - 10.4103/0974-1208.82356
Subject(s) - zygote , cryopreservation , andrology , embryo , live birth , embryo cryopreservation , blastocyst , human fertilization , biology , context (archaeology) , in vitro fertilisation , embryo transfer , gynecology , survival rate , medicine , pregnancy , embryogenesis , anatomy , surgery , genetics , paleontology
Most in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs employ embryo cryopreservation to enhance pregnancies from a single ovarian stimulation. More embryos are created, some of which are not transferred to the uterus immediately, generating a need for improved cryopreservation protocols. One protocol may involve growing embryos to a further stage of development, allowing only embryos with proven developmental capabilities to be cryopreserved. Here we examined thaw survival, implantation and live birth rates of embryos cryopreserved at different stages.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here