z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Communication of radiation risk in nuclear medicine: Are we saying the right thing?
Author(s) -
Manish Pandit,
Sobhan Vinjamuri
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
indian journal of nuclear medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.261
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 0972-3919
pISSN - 0974-0244
DOI - 10.4103/0972-3919.136554
Subject(s) - medicine , worry , risk communication , radiation exposure , risk analysis (engineering) , nuclear medicine , psychiatry , anxiety
The radiation risk arising from nuclear medicine investigations represents a small but manageable risk to patients and it needs to be effectively communicated to them. Frequently in the culture of "doctor knows best," patients trust their doctors to do whatever is right and appropriate and leave it to them to worry about any attendant risks associated with any tests involving the use of radiation. The benefit to the patient of having a speedier diagnosis and a further guide to management may not be effectively communicated in a comprehensive, timely and professional manner. In this article, we address the issue of communication of radiation risk and benefits to patients and the basis for such information. While there are different ways of communicating radiation risk, we recognize that certain basic parameters are absolutely essential for patients to enable them to make an informed choice about undergoing a nuclear medicine investigation under the direction of a well-trained and qualified individual.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here