Comparison of four different methods for detection of biofilm formation by uropathogens | Zendy

PragyanSwagatika Panda | Zendy; Uma Chaudhary | Zendy; SuryaK Dube | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison of four different methods for detection of biofilm formation by uropathogens

Author(s) -

PragyanSwagatika Panda,

Uma Chaudhary,

SuryaK Dube

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

indian journal of pathology and microbiology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.217

H-Index - 31

eISSN - 0974-5130

pISSN - 0377-4929

DOI - 10.4103/0377-4929.182013

Subject(s) - biofilm , microbiology and biotechnology , congo red , context (archaeology) , group b , agar , medicine , chemistry , biology , bacteria , paleontology , genetics , organic chemistry , adsorption

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infectious diseases encountered in clinical practice. Emerging resistance of the uropathogens to the antimicrobial agents due to biofilm formation is a matter of concern while treating symptomatic UTI. However, studies comparing different methods for detection of biofilm by uropathogens are scarce.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research