z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Eye wall resections for intraocular tumors: Our experience
Author(s) -
Tandava Krishnan,
Lingam Gopal,
Jyotirmay Biswas,
Prema Padmanabhan,
Vikas Khetan
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
indian journal of ophthalmology/indian journal of ophthalmology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.542
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1998-3689
pISSN - 0301-4738
DOI - 10.4103/0301-4738.98823
Subject(s) - medicine , ciliary body , retrospective cohort study , retinal detachment , surgery , ophthalmology , resection , vitreous hemorrhage , resection margin , retinal
We conducted a retrospective review of 11 eyes undergoing eye wall resection between October 1998 and October 2009. The median age of 11 patients was 29 years. Decreased vision (eight) was the most common presenting symptom. Ciliary body medulloepithelioma was the most common clinical diagnosis (six). Medulloepithelioma was the most common histopathological diagnosis (four). The duration of follow-up ranged from 0.5 to 67 months (median 11 months). Three eyes needed to be enucleated in the postoperative period (margin involvement two eyes, recurrence one eye). Postoperative complications among others included retinal detachment (three), vitreous hemorrhage (three), cataract (two), and suprachoroidal hemorrhage (two). To conclude, prognosis of this procedure continues to be guarded needing close postoperative follow-up.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here