z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The value of recognizing suspect diagnoses in the triple diagnosis of giant cell tumor of bone
Author(s) -
Mrinalini Kotru,
Navjeevan Singh
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
indian journal of orthopaedics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.434
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1998-3727
pISSN - 0019-5413
DOI - 10.4103/0019-5413.32038
Subject(s) - medicine , suspect , medical diagnosis , orthopedic surgery , radiology , surgery , political science , law
Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is the most frequently over-diagnosed neoplasm in orthopedic pathology because giant cells are a common component of many neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions of bone. Triple diagnosis, requiring substantial individual and collective inputs by orthopedic surgeons, radiologists and pathologists, is the preferred method for the workup of patients with suspected bone neoplasms. At each stage in triple diagnosis, deviations from the typical must be regarded as clues to alternate diagnoses: the greater the deviation, the more a diagnosis of GCT must be considered suspect. A suspect diagnosis must trigger renewed analysis of the available data and a diligent search to exclude alternate diagnoses.This review lists suspect diagnoses of GCT with a brief overview of each.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here