z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of volume controlled ventilation and pressure controlled ventilation in patients undergoing robot-assisted pelvic surgeries: An open-label trial
Author(s) -
Rishabh Jaju,
Pooja Bihani Jaju,
Mamta Dubey,
Sadik Mohammad,
Ajay Bhargava
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
indian journal of anaesthesia/indian journal of anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.645
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 0976-2817
pISSN - 0019-5049
DOI - 10.4103/0019-5049.198406
Subject(s) - medicine , trendelenburg position , anesthesia , supine position , ventilation (architecture) , peak inspiratory pressure , hemodynamics , pneumoperitoneum , mean arterial pressure , tidal volume , mean airway pressure , trendelenburg , mechanical ventilation , blood pressure , heart rate , respiratory system , surgery , laparoscopy , mechanical engineering , engineering
Although volume controlled ventilation (VCV) has been the traditional mode of ventilation in robotic surgery, recently pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) has been used more frequently. However, evidence on whether PCV is superior to VCV is still lacking. We intended to compare the effects of VCV and PCV on respiratory mechanics and haemodynamic in patients undergoing robotic surgeries in steep Trendelenburg position.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here