z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Moet ons die Belydenis van belhar (1986) as 'n nuwe Belydenisskrif aanvaar?
Author(s) -
A.C.J. van Niekerk
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
verbum et ecclesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.386
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 2074-7705
pISSN - 1609-9982
DOI - 10.4102/ve.v17i2.530
Subject(s) - confession (law) , theology , relevance (law) , philosophy , credibility , law , epistemology , political science
Can we accept the Confession of Belhar (1986) as a new doctrinal confession? The possibility exists that the Dutch Refonned Church (DRC) could stop the process of church unity in its own family due to its refusal to accept The Confession 1986 (Confession of Belhar) as afourth refonned confession. In this article the question of acceptance is examined from four perspectives and it is concluded that it should be accepted if the DRC wants to gain credibility. First the nature, characteristics and history of confessions oblige the Church in difficult situations to adopt new confessions. Secondly the history of the DRC and its family makes it imperative to overcome the gulf between believers from the same tradition through the "language of confession". Thirdly the main contents of the confession is biblically sound while absolutism of different kinds is avoided. Lastly it is argued that the confession satisfies the requirement for both contextual relevance and universal applicability

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here