Open AccessAttitudes, perceptions and barriers around evidence-based practice in sports physiotherapy in Kenya
Author(s) -
Thomas Kyengo Mwololo,
Benita Olivier,
Wallace M. Karuguti,
Joseph Mwangi Matheri
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
south african journal of physiotherapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.166
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 2410-8219
pISSN - 0379-6175
DOI - 10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1561
Subject(s) - medicine , perception , evidence based practice , test (biology) , physical therapy , family medicine , nursing , psychology , alternative medicine , paleontology , pathology , neuroscience , biology
Background Healthcare practitioners are required to integrate clinical experience with the best research evidence for the benefit of the patient. Objective Determine the attitudes, perceptions and barriers regarding evidence-based practice (EBP) in sports physiotherapy in Kenya. Method A quantitative crosssectional study was conducted among licensed physiotherapists in the Republic of Kenya through a self-administered questionnaire. Associations between selected sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, training, experience, specialisation) and attitudes, perceptions and barriers were determined using a Chi-square test. Results A 55.9% ( n = 391) response rate was recorded. A positive attitude towards EBP was reported by 94.6% ( n = 370) of the respondents. The most obvious areas of agreement with attitude-and perception-related statements were that ‘EBP is important in that patients can receive the best possible treatment’ (95.9%; n = 375), and that it is important that ‘evidence-based guidelines related to work exist’ (84.6%; n = 331). There were no significant associations between the demographic characteristics (gender p = 0.104 [ X 2 = 2.638;1]; age p = 0.495 [ X 2 = 2.393;3]; training p = 0.590 [ X 2 = 4.644;6]; experience p = 0.980 [ X 2 = 0.426;4] and specialisation p = 0.649 [ X 2 = 0.207;1]); and attitudes and perceptions regarding EBP. Insufficient time was highlighted by 57.8% ( n = 226) of the respondents as one of the ‘most important barriers’. Conclusion Although physiotherapists presented with strong positive attitudes towards EBP in sports physiotherapy, barriers were identified which could hinder the implementation of EBP in sports physiotherapy. Clinical implications Barriers to applying EBP in sports physiotherapy may lead to inferior quality of care for athletes while addressing these barriers is crucial.