z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Regstellende aksie: ’n etiese perspektief
Author(s) -
Stèfan Krüger,
G.J.M. de Klerk
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
koers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.166
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2304-8557
pISSN - 0023-270X
DOI - 10.4102/koers.v60i3.638
Subject(s) - affirmative action , action (physics) , undo , adjudication , relevance (law) , political science , law , compensation (psychology) , perspective (graphical) , law and economics , sociology , psychology , social psychology , mathematics , computer science , geometry , physics , quantum mechanics , operating system

Affirmative action: an ethical perspective. The scrapping of certain relevant laws of the apartheid era can not immediately undo the wrongs of apartheid. What is essentially needed is compensation of some kind for every individual or group who has been affected by it. The question is whether affirmative action can be ethically justified; is it inherently 'right or wrong’? In this paper different approaches to affirmative action and the normal phases of implementation of affirmative action are investigated. The best known ethical theories are then used to adjudicate the relevance ami ethical justification of affirmative action. In the final analysis six different levels of ethical decision-making are considered. The conclusion arrived at is that affirmative action is unavoidable but that there are a number o f pitfalls awaiting the unwary. To implement affirmative action successfully certain prerequisites must be met.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here