z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
American Christians for and against Parsifal: Debating the Holy Grail Opera in New York
Author(s) -
Frederick Hale
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
in die skriflig/in die skriflig
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2305-0853
pISSN - 1018-6441
DOI - 10.4102/ids.v51i1.2267
Subject(s) - opera , drama , entertainment , opposition (politics) , comics , art , holy grail , context (archaeology) , christianity , history , art history , literature , law , religious studies , visual arts , philosophy , political science , archaeology , politics , world wide web , computer science
The appropriateness of Christian themes in the performing arts has often been debated. Defenders have argued that various media, including drama, can serve as instruments of spiritual edification, while critics have contended that such efforts often eventuate in sacrilege and a vulgarising exploitation of the sacred for commercial and entertainment purposes. A heated debate took place in 1903 when Richard Wagner’s opera Parsifal, which since its première at Bayreuth in 1882 had been hailed as a magnificent representation of redemption and other themes central to Christianity, was staged at the Metropolitan Opera House in New York – its first performance as an opera outside its original venue. Numerous clergymen and lay people in several denominations sought to have the production banned and cautioned fellow Christians against seeing it. Others, generally of a theologically more liberal bent, defended the work. The heated public controversy is placed into historical context and compared with the history of Parsifal in the United Kingdom, where it was widely appreciated without noteworthy opposition

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here