z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Validity and reliability in qualitative research
Author(s) -
H Brink
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
curationis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.408
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 2223-6279
pISSN - 0379-8577
DOI - 10.4102/curationis.v16i2.1396
Subject(s) - trustworthiness , skepticism , interpretation (philosophy) , reliability (semiconductor) , qualitative research , subjectivity , psychology , validity , social psychology , computer science , data science , epistemology , engineering ethics , applied psychology , management science , sociology , social science , psychometrics , engineering , developmental psychology , philosophy , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , programming language
Validity and reliability are key aspects of all research. Meticulous attention to these two aspects can make the difference between good research and poor research and can help to assure that fellow scientists accept findings as credible and trustworthy. This is particularly vital in qualitative work, where the researcher’s subjectivity can so readily cloud the interpretation of the data, and where research findings are often questioned or viewed with scepticism by the scientific community

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom