z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Long-term results of the custom- made hip endoprostheses Evolution K® and Adaptiva®: A prospective cohort study
Author(s) -
Steffen Axt,
Andreas Kirschniak,
Lena Axt,
Manuel Braun,
Christian Beltzer,
Carmen I. Leichtle,
Ulf Leichtle
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
orthopedic reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.412
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 2035-8237
pISSN - 2035-8164
DOI - 10.4081/or.2021.9014
Subject(s) - medicine , periprosthetic , region of interest , prosthesis , bone density , nuclear medicine , surgery , osteoporosis , radiology , arthroplasty
The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K® and Adaptiva®. Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy® bone densitometer) with a long-term follow-up of 16 (15-18) years (Evolution-K®) in 24 patients and 13 (13-15) years (Adaptiva®) in 41 patients. Evolution- K® had a survival rate of 92% and yielded 79/100 points in Harris Hip Score, a mediocre result. Adaptiva® had a survival rate of 99% and achieved a good score of 88/100 points. Bone density measurements demonstrated the greatest loss of bone density in the proximal regions of interest (ROI) for both prosthesis types (Evolution-K®: -25.8% ROI 1, -40.3% ROI 7; -8.3% ROI 2, -10.4% ROI 6; Adaptiva®: -29.8% ROI 7, -6.8% ROI 6, +14.3% ROI 3, +3.1% ROI 4). Adaptiva® yielded a good clinical result as compared to Evolution-K® with only average clinical results. Both prostheses clearly showed signs of “stress shielding”. Here, the Adaptiva® achieved reduced bone density loss as compared to the Evolution-K®.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom