Open AccessSCIENZA E MATEMATICA: IL CASO DELL’INDISPENSABILITÀ
Author(s) -
Enrico Cinti
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
incontri di studio
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2384-9878
pISSN - 2279-5251
DOI - 10.4081/incontri.2019.463
Subject(s) - holism , quine , naturalism , epistemology , argument (complex analysis) , philosophy , scientific realism , realism , philosophy of science , scientific theory , chemistry , biochemistry
In this brief contribution, I will introduce one of the most famous consequences of the interaction between science and mathematics, Putnam and Quine’s argument for the indispensability of mathematical entities. We will start by looking at its standard formulation, and how it is particularly cogent for scientific realists. After this, we will look at the main components of the argument, that is indispensability, naturalism and confirmational holism. Furthermore, we will see how naturalism and confirmational holism give rise to the specific type of scientific realism that underlies Putnam and Quine’s argument. Finally, we will look at some objections and unresolved issues connected to the argument.