z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
All-Payer Rate Setting: A Framework for a More Efficient Health Care System
Author(s) -
Eric Flanagan
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
policy perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2377-7753
pISSN - 1085-7087
DOI - 10.4079/pp.v24i0.17604
Subject(s) - mandate , negotiation , leverage (statistics) , business , actuarial science , health care , public economics , public health insurance , outcome (game theory) , health insurance , economics , economic growth , microeconomics , machine learning , political science , computer science , law
The United States is unique among countries with health care systems that rely primarily on private insurance companies because there are generally no regulations that mandate a standard fee schedule for health care services. The prevalence of multiple private and public insurers is known as a multi-payer system. Other countries that have multiple payers set prices unilaterally, as is the case in Japan, or through negotiations between payers and providers, as is the case in Germany. The outcome is a uniform set of prices that applies to all payers within a single hospital. This framework is known as all-payer rate setting. This paper explains how all-payer rate setting regulation can mitigate several problems plaguing the US health care system. Examples include cost shifting, price discrimination, and provider market leverage. The paper then analyzes how these problems negatively affect the US health care system. Finally, the benefits of all-payer rate setting are explained, followed by the downsides (or tradeoffs) of such a system.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here