Open AccessImpacts of After‐School Programs on Student Outcomes
Author(s) -
Zief Susan Goerlich,
Lauver Sherri,
Maynard Rebecca A.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
campbell systematic reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.295
H-Index - 4
ISSN - 1891-1803
DOI - 10.4073/csr.2006.3
Subject(s) - attendance , recreation , psychology , context (archaeology) , inclusion (mineral) , welfare , positive youth development , intervention (counseling) , baseline (sea) , medical education , developmental psychology , social psychology , medicine , political science , paleontology , psychiatry , law , biology
This Campbell systematic review sought to answer the following questions with the available high quality experimental studies of programs that combined academic programming with other activities such as youth development or recreation: 1) To what extent and in what ways does access to after‐school programs impact student context (i.e., student location, supervision, and safety), participation in enriching activities, behaviors, social and emotional development, and academic outcomes for youth? 2) Do the effects of after‐school programs vary among subgroups of youth defined by their baseline characteristics? 3) Among the program models and settings evaluated, do some seem more beneficial to youth than others? What are the distinguishing characteristics of those more and less successful programs? This review only included well‐implemented experimental design studies. An extensive search of the literature uncovered only five studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. The five evaluated programs were fairly homogenous along many dimensions, including their target populations and settings–primarily elementary youth living in lower‐ income, urban settings. Notably, looking across the 97 impacts measured by the five studies included in this review reveals primarily null findings–84 percent showed no significant differences between the program and control youth. Also, not one of these studies reported impacts for parents. In this era of welfare reform, it might be important to understand how this type of intervention targeting low‐income youth may impact parents' job attendance and retention or parental levels of stress while balancing the demands of work and child care. Such parental outcomes could arguably mediate student social and emotional, behavioral, and academic outcomes.