Premium
Detection and imaging of piping sinkholes by integrated geophysical methods
Author(s) -
Cardarelli Ettore,
Cercato Michele,
De Donno Giorgio,
Di Filippo Gerardina
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
near surface geophysics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.639
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1873-0604
pISSN - 1569-4445
DOI - 10.3997/1873-0604.2013051
Subject(s) - sinkhole , geology , overburden , electrical resistivity tomography , piping , bedrock , geophysics , hydrogeology , exploration geophysics , ground penetrating radar , economic geology , seismic refraction , seismology , mining engineering , karst , tectonics , volcanism , geomorphology , radar , geotechnical engineering , paleontology , computer science , engineering , electrical resistivity and conductivity , telecommunications , environmental engineering , electrical engineering
Piping sinkholes may naturally develop in the case of a thick overburden overlying calcareous bedrock. Their detection and imaging is a challenging task for geophysical methods, not only because of the required resolution and depth of penetration, but also because major pitfalls may arise, in such geologically complex areas, from the speculative interpretation of geophysical anomalies as geological features. Data integration from different geophysical methods is essential to remove these interpretation ambiguities, caused by large near‐surface gradients and heterogeneities in the soil properties, as well as by oscillations of the water table and anomalous water circulation. We present an investigation procedure consisting of the sequential application and integrated interpretation of Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), Seismic Refraction Tomography (SRT) and Self Potential (SP) measurements for locating and monitoring piping sinkholes with application to a site in Central Italy. This approach is a compromise between resolution and cost‐effectiveness, and it is designed to be economically affordable by the private end user. In complex geological scenarios, it is usually not possible to rate a single geophysical technique as superior to all the others in terms of resolution, cost‐effectiveness and diagnostic capability. The independent information coming from the different geophysical methods is the key to removing interpretation ambiguity when evaluating the position and the development over time of the piping sinkholes. The application of the proposed investigation procedure allowed us to individuate a small area subject to the formation of a piping sinkhole. The geophysical results were confirmed about one year after the execution of the geophysical measurements, as the site exhibited surface evidence of a piping sinkhole, with the formation of a small pond filled with sulphurous water and gases coming from below.