z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
La heteróclisis en hetita
Author(s) -
Juan Antonio Álvarez Pedrosa
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
emérita/emerita
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.116
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 1988-8384
pISSN - 0013-6662
DOI - 10.3989/emerita.1990.v58.i2.534
Subject(s) - philosophy , linguistics
Hittite presents two types of alternance: \udThe type -r/n-, which is inherited and relatively productive, forms nouns within well-defined semantic fields: temporal designations: meh̬ur meh̬unaš; body-parts: kuttar kuttanaš; fluids: watar wetenaš, and basic natural elements: pah̬h̬ur pah̬h̬uenaš.\udThe type -r/ø appears only in the suffix -war/-waš which forms abstract nouns like taruppuwar taruppuwaš ‘meeting’. It is a development exclusive of Hittite.\udThere are three suffixes inflected by the alternance -r/n-; -(a)tar / -(a)nnaš < -(a)tnaš; -eššar/-ešnaš; -war/-unaš.\udThe great development of these suffixes —an exclusive feature of Hittite— seems to be a peculiar innovation of this language, destined to integrate certain stems in its flexion:\udThe suffix -tar/-nnaš, supposedly the inheritor of an I.E. suffix *-ter/-tn-, is used again in order to integrate the *-eH2/-H2 stems, which formed abstract nouns already from the l.E. and did not present any other productive type in Hittite. This would be the suffix -atar/-annaš.\udThe suffix -eššar/-ešnaš integrates the *-es/-os I.E. nouns in the Hittite nominal system, which formed abstract nouns already in I.E.; this suffix does not appear in other inflected type in Hittite.\udThe suffix -war/-unaš, on the contrary, is not productive and can create designations of parts of animal bodies and abstract nouns as well

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here