z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
La estructura de las revoluciones científicas según Thomas Kuhn en el análisis de la historia del arte
Author(s) -
María Eugenia Rabadán Villalpando
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
arbor
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.154
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 1988-303X
pISSN - 0210-1963
DOI - 10.3989/arbor.2017.783n1003
Subject(s) - humanities , art , philosophy
This article offers some solutions to problems relating to the theory and methodology of a particular piece of research into modern and contemporary landscaping. It concerns the dynamic processes of theoretical, epistemological and formal changes in the visual arts in the 20th and 21st centuries. The analysis, based on the structuralism of scientific revolutions first published by Thomas Kuhn, offers some answers to the debate on the articulation of paradigms in the history of science, according to Kuhn, instead of the articulation of styles in art history, according to Heinrich Wölfflin, Meyer Shapiro and Ernst Gombrich, among others, considering science and art as entities of a different nature. Kuhn’s approach to art history, particularly to the work of Gombrich, leads us to draw a parallel between science and art in Kuhn’s work, where he attempted to articulate paradigms in art history

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here