z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mathematics is Ontology? A Critique of Badiou's Ontological Framing of Set Theory
Author(s) -
Roland Bolz
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
filozofski vestnik
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.103
H-Index - 7
eISSN - 1581-1239
pISSN - 0353-4510
DOI - 10.3986/fv.41.2.06
Subject(s) - mereology , ontology , assertion , epistemology , fundamental ontology , philosophy , framing (construction) , set (abstract data type) , metaphysics , criticism , computer science , art , literature , structural engineering , engineering , programming language
This article develops a criticism of Alain Badiou’s assertion that “mathematics is ontology.” I argue that despite appearances to the contrary, Badiou’s case for bringing set theory and ontology together is problematic. To arrive at this judgment, I explore how a case for the identification of mathematics and ontology could work. In short, ontology would have to be characterised to make it evident that set theory can contribute to it fundamentally. This is indeed how Badiou proceeds in Being and Event. I review his descriptions of the ontological problematic at some length here, only to argue that set theory is a poor fit. Although philosophers working on questions of being were certainly occupied with matters of oneness and the part-whole relationship, I argue that Badiou’s discussion of philosophical sources points towards a mereological treatment, not a set-theoretic one. Finally, I suggest that Badiou’s philosophical interpretations of key set-theoretic results are better understood as some sort of analogising between mathematics, ontology, and philosophical anthropology.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here