Open AccessInterdisciplinary methodologies for the fan studies bricoleur
Author(s) -
Naomi Jacobs
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
transformative works and cultures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1941-2258
DOI - 10.3983/twc.2020.1665
Subject(s) - multidisciplinary approach , discipline , sociology , variety (cybernetics) , field (mathematics) , participatory action research , parallels , citizen journalism , engineering ethics , action research , value (mathematics) , cohesion (chemistry) , bricolage , space (punctuation) , social science , computer science , engineering , pedagogy , visual arts , artificial intelligence , anthropology , mechanical engineering , art , chemistry , mathematics , organic chemistry , machine learning , world wide web , pure mathematics , operating system
As a relatively young field, which brings together scholars from a wide variety of different home disciplines, fan studies faces questions of disciplinary cohesion and methodological practice. Moving from a multidisciplinary space to an interdisciplinary field that creates new synergistic knowledge is facilitated by cross-discipline communication and collaboration. However, this is impeded by many barriers. Examining the history of design research provides useful parallels that may help us learn from the experiences of researchers who faced similar concerns. A bricolage approach will allow scholars in new fields of knowledge to benefit from an interdisciplinary landscape that provides methodological breadth. By using such an approach, fan studies researchers can borrow or synthesize the tools most appropriate to their research questions; for example, participatory action research is a methodology that fan studies researchers may find useful. Participatory approaches may cut through issues of fan/academic positioning and contribute to research with positive social value.