z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
(Bad) reputation in relational contracting
Author(s) -
Deb Rahul,
Mitchell Matthew,
Pai Mallesh M.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
theoretical economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.404
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1555-7561
pISSN - 1933-6837
DOI - 10.3982/te4803
Subject(s) - reputation , incentive , microeconomics , principal (computer security) , value (mathematics) , business , term (time) , economics , industrial organization , computer science , computer security , social science , physics , quantum mechanics , machine learning , sociology
Motivated by markets for “expertise,” we study a bandit model where a principal chooses between a safe and risky arm. A strategic agent controls the risky arm and privately knows whether its type is high or low. Irrespective of type, the agent wants to maximize duration of experimentation with the risky arm. However, only the high type arm can generate value for the principal. Our main insight is that reputational incentives can be exceedingly strong unless both players coordinate on maximally inefficient strategies on path. We discuss implications for online content markets, term limits for politicians, and experts in organizations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here