z-logo
Premium
On the Asymptotic Optimality of Empirical Likelihood for Testing Moment Restrictions
Author(s) -
Kitamura Yuichi,
Santos Andres,
Shaikh Azeem M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
econometrica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 16.7
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1468-0262
pISSN - 0012-9682
DOI - 10.3982/ecta8773
Subject(s) - mathematics , empirical likelihood , zero (linguistics) , type i and type ii errors , moment (physics) , statistics , type (biology) , exponential function , econometrics , confidence interval , mathematical analysis , ecology , philosophy , linguistics , physics , classical mechanics , biology
We show by example that empirical likelihood and other commonly used tests for moment restrictions are unable to control the (exponential) rate at which the probability of a Type I error tends to zero unless the possible distributions for the observed data are restricted appropriately. From this, it follows that for the optimality claim for empirical likelihood in Kitamura (2001) to hold, additional assumptions and qualifications are required. Under stronger assumptions than those in Kitamura (2001), we establish the following optimality result: (i) empirical likelihood controls the rate at which the probability of a Type I error tends to zero and (ii) among all procedures for which the probability of a Type I error tends to zero at least as fast, empirical likelihood maximizes the rate at which the probability of a Type II error tends to zero for most alternatives. This result further implies that empirical likelihood maximizes the rate at which the probability of a Type II error tends to zero for all alternatives among a class of tests that satisfy a weaker criterion for their Type I error probabilities.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here