Premium
Time Lotteries and Stochastic Impatience
Author(s) -
DeJarnette Patrick,
Dillenberger David,
Gottlieb Daniel,
Ortoleva Pietro
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
econometrica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 16.7
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1468-0262
pISSN - 0012-9682
DOI - 10.3982/ecta16427
Subject(s) - lottery , expected utility hypothesis , economics , discounting , generalization , isoelastic utility , mathematical economics , property (philosophy) , time preference , econometrics , simple (philosophy) , dynamic inconsistency , class (philosophy) , independence (probability theory) , microeconomics , mathematics , computer science , statistics , mathematical analysis , philosophy , finance , epistemology , artificial intelligence
We study preferences over lotteries in which both the prize and the payment date are uncertain. In particular, a time lottery is one in which the prize is fixed but the date is random. With Expected Discounted Utility, individuals must be risk seeking over time lotteries (RSTL). In an incentivized experiment, however, we find that almost all subjects violate this property. Our main contributions are theoretical. We first show that within a very broad class of models, which includes many forms of nonexpected utility and time discounting, it is impossible to accommodate even a single violation of RSTL without also violating a property we termed Stochastic Impatience, a risky counterpart of standard Impatience. We then present two positive results. If one wishes to maintain Stochastic Impatience, violations of RSTL can be accommodated by keeping Independence within periods while relaxing it across periods. If, instead, one is willing to forego Stochastic Impatience, violations of RSTL can be accommodated with a simple generalization of Expected Discounted Utility, obtained by imposing only the behavioral postulates of Discounted Utility and Expected Utility.