Open AccessIzvršenje u francuskom upravnom sporu
Author(s) -
Bosiljka Britvić Vetma,
Ivan Malenica
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
zbornik pravnog fakulteta u zagrebu
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.134
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 1849-1154
pISSN - 0350-2058
DOI - 10.3935/zpfz.70.6.01
Subject(s) - administrative court , adjudication , law , political science , federal court , order (exchange) , administrative law , constitutional court , business , state (computer science) , court of record , incentive , public administration , original jurisdiction , jurisdiction , supreme court , computer science , constitution , economics , finance , algorithm , microeconomics
Court decisions are mandatory for the party who must execute them. Similarly, the party may seek that the administrative court “order” the public legal entity to execute court judgements within a specific timeframe. In the case of a refusal to execute a decision, the administrative court can punish the public legal entity. To be more specific, in administrative court adjudication, the Republic of France’s procedural methods used in the case of non-execution of administrative court decisions range from incentive to repressive measures. An immense contribution to effective execution of administrative court decisions has been made by two institutions: the Department for Reporting and Studies of the State Council and the Public Ombudsman.