
Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries
Author(s) -
Helga Kristín Hallgrímsdóttir,
Leah Shumka,
Catherine Althaus,
Cecilia Benoit
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
aims public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2327-8994
DOI - 10.3934/publichealth.2017.6.615
Subject(s) - childbirth , caesarean section , psychological intervention , population , warrant , health care , public health , intervention (counseling) , medicine , economic growth , business , political science , pregnancy , environmental health , economics , nursing , finance , genetics , biology
In Canada, as elsewhere in the world, caesarean sections are the most common surgical procedure performed in hospitals annually. Recent national statistics indicate 28% of infants in Canada are born by c-section while in the United States that number rises to 33%. This is despite World Health Organization recommendations that at a population level only 10-15% of births warrant this form of medical intervention. This trend has become cause for concern in recent decades due to the short and long-term health risks to pregnant women and infants, as well as the financial burden it places on public health care systems. Others warn this trend may result in a collective loss of cultural knowledge of a normal physiological process and, in the process, establish a new "normal" childbirth. Despite a range of interventions to curb c-section rates-enhanced prenatal care and innovation in pregnancy monitoring, change in hospital level policies, procedures and protocols, as well as public education campaigns-they remain stubbornly resistant to stabilization, let alone, reduction in high-income countries. We explore-through a review of the academic and grey literature-the role of cultural and social narratives around risk, and the responsibilization of the pregnant woman and the medical practitioner in creating this kind of resistance to intervention today.