Open Access
Peaberry and normal coffee bean classification using CNN, SVM, and KNN: Their implementation in and the limitations of Raspberry Pi 3
Author(s) -
Hira Lal Gope,
Hidekazu Fukai
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
aims agriculture and food
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316
H-Index - 8
ISSN - 2471-2086
DOI - 10.3934/agrfood.2022010
Subject(s) - support vector machine , sorting , raspberry pi , artificial intelligence , sort , blowing a raspberry , convolutional neural network , pattern recognition (psychology) , computer science , pixel , mathematics , machine learning , algorithm , horticulture , database , biology , embedded system , internet of things
Peaberries are a special type of coffee bean with an oval shape. Peaberries are not considered defective, but separating peaberries is important to make the shapes of the remaining beans uniform for roasting evenly. The separation of peaberries and normal coffee beans increases the value of both peaberries and normal coffee beans in the market. However, it is difficult to sort peaberries from normal beans using existing commercial sorting machines because of their similarities. In previous studies, we have shown the availability of image processing and machine learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), and k-nearest-neighbors (KNNs), for the classification of peaberries and normal beans using a powerful desktop PC. As the next step, assuming the use of our system in the least developed countries, this study was performed to examine their implementation in and the limitations of Raspberry Pi 3. To improve the performance, we modified the CNN architecture from our previous studies. As a result, we found that the CNN model outperformed both linear SVM and KNN on the use of Raspberry Pi 3. For instance, the trained CNN could classify approximately 13.77 coffee bean images per second with 98.19% accuracy of the classification with 64×64 pixel color images on Raspberry Pi 3. There were limitations of Raspberry Pi 3 for linear SVM and KNN on the use of large image sizes because of the system's small RAM size. Generally, the linear SVM and KNN were faster than the CNN with small image sizes, but we could not obtain better results with both the linear SVM and KNN than the CNN in terms of the classification accuracy. Our results suggest that the combination of the CNN and Raspberry Pi 3 holds the promise of inexpensive peaberries and a normal bean sorting system for the least developed countries.