z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Overall survival in stage IV EGFR mutation‑positive NSCLC: Comparing first‑, second‑ and third‑generation EGFR‑TKIs (Review)
Author(s) -
Ashok Vaid,
Alok Gupta,
Gagandeep Momi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.405
H-Index - 122
ISSN - 1019-6439
DOI - 10.3892/ijo.2021.5168
Subject(s) - osimertinib , medicine , oncology , lung cancer , clinical endpoint , hazard ratio , gefitinib , epidermal growth factor receptor , progression free survival , confidence interval , cancer , erlotinib , clinical trial , chemotherapy
A substantial (40‑60%) proportion of patients with non‑small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, a crucial therapeutic target in NSCLC. Treatment strategies for patients with advanced‑stage NSCLC have markedly changed, from the empirical use of cytotoxic agents to targeted regimens. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the first‑line therapy for advanced NSCLC, are reported to be the most effective. Although progression‑free survival (PFS) and objective response rates have long been used as endpoints, meeting these endpoints may not necessarily coincide with an increase in overall survival (OS) among patients with advanced lung cancer. Recently, the FLAURA study with the third‑generation, irreversible, oral EGFR‑TKI, osimertinib, demonstrated an extended median OS by 6.8 months compared with standard EGFR‑TKIs, with a 20% reduction in the risk of mortality [osimertinib, 38.6; EGFR‑TKIs, 31.8; hazard ratio (HR), 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.641‑0.997; P=0.046]; this was in addition to meeting the primary endpoint of clinically and statistically significant PFS. Osimertinib was also shown to lead to a statistically significant reduction in the risk of central nervous system disease progression (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26‑0.86; P=0.014). Notably, 28% of patients remained on osimertinib treatment for 3 years, considerably longer than those in the comparator group (9%). The duration of first subsequent treatment with osimertinib was 25.5 months compared with 13.7 months with standard EGFR‑TKIs (HR, 0.478; 95% CI, 0.393‑0.581; P<0.0001). Thus, the long‑term OS benefit with first‑line osimertinib highlights a promising option in the management of stage IV NSCLC. The present narrative review compares the OS benefit of first‑, second‑ and third‑generation EGFR‑TKIs for patients with stage IV EGFR mutation‑positive NSCLC and discusses their role in disease management.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom