z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Genomic Prediction of Manganese Efficiency in Winter Barley
Author(s) -
Leplat Florian,
Jensen Just,
Madsen Per
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the plant genome
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 41
ISSN - 1940-3372
DOI - 10.3835/plantgenome2015.09.0085
Subject(s) - best linear unbiased prediction , biology , trait , hordeum vulgare , quantitative trait locus , selection (genetic algorithm) , plant breeding , predictive modelling , abiotic stress , genomic selection , microbiology and biotechnology , statistics , genetics , agronomy , mathematics , machine learning , single nucleotide polymorphism , gene , poaceae , computer science , genotype , programming language
Manganese efficiency is a quantitative abiotic stress trait controlled by several genes each with a small effect. Manganese deficiency leads to yield reduction in winter barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.). Breeding new cultivars for this trait remains difficult because of the lack of visual symptoms and the polygenic features of the trait. Hence, Mn efficiency is a potential suitable trait for a genomic selection (GS) approach. A collection of 248 winter barley varieties was screened for Mn efficiency using Chlorophyll a (Chl a ) fluorescence in six environments prone to induce Mn deficiency. Two models for genomic prediction were implemented to predict future performance and breeding value of untested varieties. Predictions were obtained using multivariate mixed models: best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) and genomic best linear unbiased predictor (G‐BLUP). In the first model, predictions were based on the phenotypic evaluation, whereas both phenotypic and genomic marker data were included in the second model. Accuracy of predicting future phenotype, r ( g ^ , y ^ ) , and accuracy of predicting true breeding values, r ( g ^ , g ) , were calculated and compared for both models using six cross‐validation (CV) schemes; these were designed to mimic plant breeding programs. Overall, the CVs showed that prediction accuracies increased when using the G‐BLUP model compared with the prediction accuracies using the BLUP model. Furthermore, the accuracies [ r ( g ^ , g ) ] of predicting breeding values were more accurate than accuracy of predicting future phenotypes [ r ( g ^ , y ^ ) ]. The study confirms that genomic data may enhance the prediction accuracy. Moreover it indicates that GS is a suitable breeding approach for quantitative abiotic stress traits.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here