z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Effect of Vitamin D treatment on COVID 19- Patients, an Inverted Propensity Score Weighting (IPSW), and Inverted Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) Analyzed Study
Author(s) -
Jamal Wadi Al Ramahi,
Nour Hasan,
Amal Matar,
Ma’en Maher Al-Ali,
Lara Abdulhadi,
Dania Abu Kaf,
Waseem Saadeh,
Nour Hamdan,
Hassan Abu Khalaf,
Mohamed Gharaibeh,
Hanadi Hamadallah,
Ala’a Bader,
Mohammad Atout,
Sae’ed Moh. Mar’I,
Tamer Alhamed
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
the international arabic journal of antimicrobial agents
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2174-9094
DOI - 10.3823/862
Subject(s) - medicine , propensity score matching , vitamin d and neurology , cohort , cumulative dose , covid-19 , retrospective cohort study , logistic regression , vitamin , cohort study , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty)
BackgroundVitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2 cholecalciferol) as a treatment for COVID 19 patients is being disputed, and a clear clinical benefit is not being confirmed.MethodsA retrospective evaluation for COVID-19 patients who were treated with various cumulative doses of vitamin D. Data was extracted from the COVID-19 database, it included patients admitted to three hospitals in Amman, Jordan. Characteristics of patients were tabulated and compared for all-cohort, and propensity score index (PSI) adjustment, The comparison was based on two vitamin D strata ((≤ 149,000 i.u. and > 150,000 i.u.). Logistic regression analysis was utilized to predict recovery, the need for oxygen, and all-cause mortality for all-cohort, IPSW, and IPTW patients, based on vitamin D cumulative doses during their hospital stay.Results 1131 all-cohort and 768 PSI-adjusted patients were recruited. Except for antibiotics and antivirals, all other characteristics were balanced (P = NS). There were 1017 patients on vitamin D, 847 received cumulative ≤ 149,000 i.u., and 170 patients received cumulative dose ≥ 150,000 i.u. (Range 1000 – 385000). It was demonstrated that escalating cumulative doses of vitamin D did not contribute to the assessed outcomes; all-cohort patients (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000 to 1.000), IPSW (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000 to 1.000), and the IPTW (OR = 1.000, 95% C.I. 1.000 to 1.000).Conclusion In our patients’ cohorts, we could not demonstrate a beneficial effect for vitamin D therapy in COVID-19 patients for recovery, the need for home oxygen, and all-cause mortality, by hospital discharge.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom