Open AccessDetermination of Shoe Quality by Comparison of Two Methods for Improve Selection
Author(s) -
Muhardi Saputra,
Tubagus Prakoso,
jaswir singh,
Muhammad Syahputra Novelan,
Abdul Meizar,
Siti Aisyah
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of innovative science and research technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2456-2165
DOI - 10.38124/ijisrt20aug285
Subject(s) - weighting , selection (genetic algorithm) , quality (philosophy) , product (mathematics) , value (mathematics) , computer science , simple (philosophy) , mathematics , artificial intelligence , machine learning , medicine , philosophy , geometry , epistemology , radiology
Using two methods in decision support according to some circles is very inefficient and redundant (excessive), because in terms of results will be the same. However, according to the author, it is not entirely true, sometimes comparing the two methods is necessary in increasing the confidence of the election (decision). Likewise, if we want to get something, we have to compare from several sources. So basically it will convince the choice (decision). The comparison of the two methods in this study is Simple Additive Weighted (SAW) and Weighting Product (WP) because it uses weight values as the basis of reference. The case told is choosing the quality of shoes based on the brand on the type of sport shoes (sports shoes). The purpose of this research is to determine the best shoe brand, but the main thing is to add value to the confidence of the choice because it has been tested by two methods.