Open AccessHaydegger and Sartr: I, the Other and People in the context of the problem of education
Author(s) -
Олександр Волков
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
european humanities studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2413-9025
DOI - 10.38014/ehs-ss.2020.2.01
Subject(s) - existentialism , dialectic , shame , interpretation (philosophy) , epistemology , context (archaeology) , identification (biology) , uniqueness , reflexive pronoun , social psychology , psychology , sociology , philosophy , history , linguistics , botany , archaeology , biology
The article compares the interpretation of the relationship between I, the Other and People in the existentialism of Heidegger and Sartre. For Heidegger, the Other is a henchman, an area that is determined by the execution of a case. Care that is pre-ontological and therefore impossible to consider. Orientation is the identification of relationships between places, which is why a person must maintain a distance. Its necessity is explained by the fact that I am on the premises of People. The impotence of the Self is due to the fact that it is impossible to determine what People are. As a result, each person seeks to be invisible, hide in the middle. Unlike Heidegger, Sartre explores the Self as an independent entity, which is in dialectic relations with Another. Therefore, it depends on the teacher as Another how I will be the pupil. The influence of Another is explained by a look that clarifies: who is who. That is why the teacher has the opportunity to shame the children. With it, a child has the opportunity to see his uniqueness and uniqueness, in other words, become a person.