Open AccessThe Bua group noun class system: looking for a historical interpretation
Author(s) -
Pascal Boyeldieu,
Raimund Kastenholz,
Ulrich Kleinewillinghöfer,
Florian Lionnet
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
language in africa
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2686-8946
DOI - 10.37892/2686-8946-2020-1-3-181-215
Subject(s) - suffix , linguistics , noun , determiner , interpretation (philosophy) , noun phrase , proper noun , nominalization , class (philosophy) , mathematics , independence (probability theory) , history , computer science , artificial intelligence , philosophy , statistics
The way Bua languages express number on nouns mostly consists of alternating suffixes that bear witness of a former classification system. However, Kulaal is the only present-day language where these markers are not frozen but actually trigger agreement with free, optional determiners that follow the noun and may show some formal affinity with its suffix. For several reasons, previous attempts at reconstructing a historical noun morphology common to all Bua languages considered the sole suffixes and neglected the determiners present in Kulaal. But, as is argued in the present paper, more recent data show that, in some cases, present-day suffixes may result from the association of a former suffix with an element similar to one of the Kulaal determiners. In such cases the former determiner has simply lost its independence and been historically stacked onto the noun form.