z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prezența militară rusească în Republica Moldova prin prisma jurisprudenței CEDO / Russian military presence in the Republic of Moldova in the light of ECHR jurisprudence
Author(s) -
Alexandru Tănase
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plural : history. culture. society = istorie. cultură. societate
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.187
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 2345-184X
pISSN - 2345-1262
DOI - 10.37710/plural.v9i2_3
Subject(s) - romanian , tribunal , political science , argument (complex analysis) , law , human rights , diplomacy , jurisprudence , the republic , politics , res judicata , philosophy , epistemology , biochemistry , linguistics , chemistry
In the article below, I analyse the role of the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Ilașcu and others v. Moldova and Russia. This judgment, being pronounced by an international tribunal, benefits from the authority and power of the res judicata. However, this argument was “strategically ignored” by the Moldovan political establishment. I tried to find the answer to the question: Why has Moldovan diplomacy never used this strong argument, provided by the ECHR?

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here