z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Andrea Chiricescu, Who Are the Real Stakeholders of a Nominated UNESCO Site? A Glimpse into the Contextualisation of a Rather Scientific Approach to World Heritage Nominations
Author(s) -
Andrea Chiricescu
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plural : history. culture. society = istorie. cultură. societate
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.187
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 2345-184X
pISSN - 2345-1262
DOI - 10.37710/plural.v8i1_5
Subject(s) - nomination , plan (archaeology) , world heritage , subject (documents) , political science , public relations , scale (ratio) , order (exchange) , raising (metalworking) , process (computing) , history , sociology , library science , law , business , geography , engineering , computer science , archaeology , mechanical engineering , cartography , tourism , finance , operating system
At the current time Romania, as a state, has set up a mechanism to implement the nomination procedure for the Dacian Limes on the UNESCO World Heritage List, as part of the FRE – Frontiers of the Roman Empire. While drafting the nomination and the management plan, the issue of different categories of stakeholders should be discussed and activities should be planned accordingly. In order to plan a series of activities a thorough analysis should be made, to establish who are the stakeholders of such an endeavour, when and how they should be addressed, what roles and responsibilities they have within the current process and within the management of the future World HeritageSite. This article is not meant to be an exhaustive approach to the subject, it is just the beginning of a deeper and more thorough study of the issue, bringing some examples of small-scale good practices, the lesson’s learned by other countries and raising questions to be answered in the future.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here