z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Rhetorical questions: Severing asking from questioning
Author(s) -
María Biezma,
Kyle Rawlins
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2163-5951
pISSN - 2163-5943
DOI - 10.3765/salt.v27i0.4155
Subject(s) - interrogative , presupposition , rhetorical question , assertion , interrogative word , context (archaeology) , linguistics , epistemology , computer science , dynamics (music) , function (biology) , psychology , philosophy , history , programming language , pedagogy , archaeology , evolutionary biology , biology
Rhetorical questions (RhQs) are puzzling for theoretical accounts of questions: while they have an interrogative form, they seem to provide the same information as a parallel assertion. We propose that solving this puzzle requires a deeper understanding of the dynamics of interrogative utterances, and in particular we argue for a dynamics parallel to what has recently been proposed for assertions and imperatives: uttering an interrogative is a proposal to update the context, in this case the QUD, and its acceptance leads to the final inquisitive update. We argue that RhQs are interrogatives triggering the presupposition that the context entails the answer, so if accepted as a QUD, they would be immediately answered. This, in combination with the dynamics we develop, allows us to explain both the similarities with assertions as well as the differences in their discourse function. 

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here