z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Conditional inversion and GIVENNESS
Author(s) -
María Biezma
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2163-5951
pISSN - 2163-5943
DOI - 10.3765/salt.v21i0.2591
Subject(s) - inversion (geology) , antecedent (behavioral psychology) , linguistics , computer science , subject (documents) , meaning (existential) , natural language processing , artificial intelligence , psychology , epistemology , philosophy , social psychology , paleontology , structural basin , library science , biology
This paper provides support for the claim that non-canonical word-order adds “extra meaning” to natural language utterances (Prince). In particular, it tells us about the informational status of the constituents. The case study in this paper is subject-auxiliary inversion in conditional antecedents. I argue that subject-auxiliary inversion in conditional antecedents indicate that the antecedent is GIVEN (Schwarzschild 1999). This proposal explain further pragmatic inferences such as why inverted conditionals are particularly good as reproaches.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here