z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Witnessable quantifiers license type-e meaning: Evidence from contrastive topic, equatives and supplements
Author(s) -
Noah Constant
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2163-5951
pISSN - 2163-5943
DOI - 10.3765/salt.v0i0.2652
Subject(s) - linguistics , type (biology) , plural , meaning (existential) , class (philosophy) , frame (networking) , scope (computer science) , quantifier (linguistics) , computer science , mathematics , artificial intelligence , philosophy , epistemology , ecology , telecommunications , biology , programming language
This paper presents three novel ways of testing which plural quantificational phrases can denote individuals (type e). Specifically, it is argued that only type-e expressions can (i) be marked as a contrastive topic in a discourse contrasting individuals, (ii) be equated with another type-e expression in an equative frame, and (iii) anchor supplementing material. The main empirical finding is that the class of quantifiers allowing type-e nominal denotations is larger than assumed on classic accounts like Reinhart 1997. Furthermore, this class is characterizable in semantic terms. The quantifiers that give rise to type-e meanings are "witnessable" in the sense of entailing the existence of an individual satisfying both their restrictor and their nuclear scope.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here