z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Volga Bulgarian-Permic linguistic contact: Mutual influences on morphology
Author(s) -
Julian Kreidl
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
proceedings of the workshop on turkic and languages in contact with turkic
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2641-3485
DOI - 10.3765/ptu.v6i1.5053
Subject(s) - bulgarian , linguistics , plural , volga region , possessive , genitive case , parallels , slavic languages , history , language contact , geography , ancient history , philosophy , mechanical engineering , noun , engineering
In this paper, I argue that three morphological (morphosyntactic) features in Udmurt, Komi, Volga Bulgarian and Chuvash show mutual influence between the Proto-Permic and Volga Bulgarian languages in the Volga-Kama area in the late first millennium CE: First, the formal identity of the Permic accusative and 3sg possessive suffixes which does not have parallels in Uralic but in Turkic. Second, the Volga Bulgarian and Chuvash plural marker -sem, which is unknown from other Turkic languages. Third, the prohibitive particle an in Chuvash, which does not have cognates in Turkic and is loaned from Proto-Permic.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here