Minimization of corruption risks in the process of ensuring the constitutional right to housing through state and local budget programs (domestic and foreign experience)

In any society, to meet the housing need, there is a set of conditions for its implementation, which all together form the housing system, but in no society at the appropriate level, this problem is not completely solved. It is established that preferential provision of housing for citizens is carried out through mechanisms: providing citizens with affordable housing; provided for the implementation of state, regional and local housing programs for certain categories of the population; provision of social housing to socially vulnerable segments of the population. Preferential provision of housing for citizens is carried out through mechanisms: providing citizens with affordable housing; provided for the implementation of state, regional and local housing programs for certain categories of the population; providing social housing to socially vulnerable groups. Execution of state housing programs may be subject to corruption risks during their implementation, and officials responsible for their implementation may be subject to corruption offenses in the performance of their official duties. In the process of implementing housing programs, anti-corruption measures should begin with the development of directions, strategies and programs, which should include collecting reliable data on the problem, developing effective implementation mechanisms, detailed analysis and monitoring of the results with public participation, legal examination of draft regulations for their compliance with anti-corruption legislation. Local authorities play an important role in providing housing for citizens. Іmplementation of housing programs in our country usually has a 2-tier structure: central and local, local governments often only act as intermediaries between the central government and the main housing sectors.