
Some "( "ضعیفweak) Commentators of Quran of the early ages and the nature of their referential authenticity
Author(s) -
شبانہ نورین
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
fahm-i islām
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2664-0031
pISSN - 2664-0023
DOI - 10.37605/fahm-i-islam.1.1.4
Subject(s) - revelation , islam , philosophy , demise , verdict , literature , comprehension , epistemology , weakness , psychology , history , law , theology , linguistics , art , political science , medicine , anatomy
Just after the sad demise of Prophet ,صلى الله عليه وسلمhis companion’s initiated using a verycautious behavior in writing the commentaries of "Quran". They would presentonly those commentaries of "Quran" which they would listen from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلمeither directly or indirectly; or they would have seen the circumstances ofthe revelation of a verse by themselves in person or that which would havedawned upon them by the way of a verdict and derivation. However, thecommentators of the later eras did not take into consideration this cautiousness.Due to this very reason, all those Quran and Sunna's commentary relatedtraditions reported from them, a great amount of weakness is found in the same.This weakness, causes a great defect in the comprehension of (religion).Consequently, the " "ائمہof the critical study of the Hadith etc while criticizing it,have not only disclosed their weakness but rather they have added a term of" "ضعيفweak Hadith narrators and untrustworthy narrators in the Islamicliterature. In this Article, a critical review of the sayings of the ""ائمہجرح وتعديلhaving deliberated on the authenticity of the references of the commentators ofthe early ages (of Islam), is being presented.