z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Some "( "ضعیفweak) Commentators of Quran of the early ages and the nature of their referential authenticity
Author(s) -
شبانہ نورین
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
fahm-i islām
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2664-0031
pISSN - 2664-0023
DOI - 10.37605/fahm-i-islam.1.1.4
Subject(s) - revelation , islam , philosophy , demise , verdict , literature , comprehension , epistemology , weakness , psychology , history , law , theology , linguistics , art , political science , medicine , anatomy
Just after the sad demise of Prophet ,صلى الله عليه وسلمhis companion’s initiated using a verycautious behavior in writing the commentaries of "Quran". They would presentonly those commentaries of "Quran" which they would listen from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلمeither directly or indirectly; or they would have seen the circumstances ofthe revelation of a verse by themselves in person or that which would havedawned upon them by the way of a verdict and derivation. However, thecommentators of the later eras did not take into consideration this cautiousness.Due to this very reason, all those Quran and Sunna's commentary relatedtraditions reported from them, a great amount of weakness is found in the same.This weakness, causes a great defect in the comprehension of (religion).Consequently, the " "ائمہof the critical study of the Hadith etc while criticizing it,have not only disclosed their weakness but rather they have added a term of" "ضعيفweak Hadith narrators and untrustworthy narrators in the Islamicliterature. In this Article, a critical review of the sayings of the ""ائمہجرح وتعديلhaving deliberated on the authenticity of the references of the commentators ofthe early ages (of Islam), is being presented.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here