z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NIZAMI GANJAVI’S EPICS “MAKHZAN UL-ASROR” AND ALISHER NAVOI’S “HAYRAT UL-ABROR”
Author(s) -
Mamura Khayrullaevna Rashidova,
AUTHOR_ID
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
current research journal of philological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2767-3758
DOI - 10.37547/philological-crjps-02-12-20
Subject(s) - theme (computing) , literature , ideology , repetition (rhetorical device) , turkish , variety (cybernetics) , art , philosophy , linguistics , computer science , politics , law , political science , artificial intelligence , world wide web
The first works of the series of epics “Khamsa” by the great thinkers Nizami Ganjavi and Alisher Navoi are called “Makhzan ul-Asror” and Hayrat ul-Abror “. Both epics are on a philosophical-ethical theme, reflecting the social views of the great scholar-poets. “Makhzan ul-Asror” is written in Persian, and “Hayrat ul-Abror” is written in Turkish. Although these works are ideologically complementary, they are by no means a repetition of each other. A comparative analysis of both epics highlights the uniqueness of the method of expression, the different attitudes to events and happenings, and the importance of the variety of exemplary stories.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here