z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Fifth Indifference
Author(s) -
Derek Warden
Publication year - 2019
Language(s) - English
DOI - 10.37419/lr.v7.arg.1
Subject(s) - confusion , plaintiff , damages , law , law and economics , political science , psychology , sociology , psychoanalysis
The Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities. Title II of the ADA applies to public entities. That same Title allows plaintiffs to obtain damages upon a showing that the discrimination was intentional. There are generally two possible standards of intent: (1) deliberate indifference or (2) animus. While most Circuit Courts expressly adopted the deliberate indifference model, the Fifth Circuit has not. Indeed, the Fifth Circuit has not adopted any standard and this has led to confusion. The confusion is not helped, moreover, by the sheer lack of justification offered by a number of the Circuit Courts who have adopted either standard. This Essay seeks to clear that confusion. It offers reasons why deliberate indifference, and not the animus standard, should apply to ADA Title II claims. Further, it explains why no Fifth Circuit precedent should be construed as prohibiting the adoption of the deliberate indifference standard.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here