z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Virginia
Author(s) -
Mason Heidt
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of property law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2572-7117
pISSN - 2572-7044
DOI - 10.37419/jpl.v6.i3.18
Subject(s) - deed , severance , law , supreme court , west virginia , estate , coal , political science , meaning (existential) , archaeology , history , philosophy , epistemology
This Article addresses developments in Virginia oil and gas law for the period from July 31, 2014 to July 31, 2019. This period is longer than normally addressed by this journal to capture important developments in the law between this update and the last Virginia update published in 2015. At the state level, in Swords Creek Land Partnership v. Belcher, the Supreme Court of Virginia concluded coalbed methane (“CBM”) is a separate and distinct mineral estate from coal. It held that the meaning of “coal” within an 1887 severance deed was unambiguous and did not intend to convey ownership rights to the CBM.1 This decision reaffirmed and expanded the Court’s previous holding in Harrison-Wyatt. In Dye v. CNX Gas Co., the Court held that a deed conveying “all coal and minerals” was also unambiguous and with the addition of the “and minerals” language constituted a transfer of CBM.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here