z-logo
Premium
Evolution of self‐fertilization at geographical range margins? A comparison of demographic, floral, and mating system variables in central vs. peripheral populations of Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae)
Author(s) -
Herlihy Christopher R.,
Eckert Christopher G.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.3732/ajb.92.4.744
Subject(s) - biology , selfing , outcrossing , inbreeding depression , range (aeronautics) , population , ecology , mating system , mating , inbreeding , pollen , demography , materials science , sociology , composite material
Biogeographic models predict that geographically peripheral populations should be smaller, more sparsely distributed, and have a lower per‐capita reproductive rate than populations near the center of a species'range. Plants in peripheral populations may, therefore, receive less pollinator visitation and outcross pollination, which may select for self‐fertilization to provide reproductive assurance. We tested these predictions by comparing population size, plant density, seed production, floral traits, and mating system parameters between 10 populations of Aquilegia canadensis near the northern margin of the range with 10 near the range center. Contrary to predictions, peripheral populations were not smaller, less dense, nor less productive than central populations. Nevertheless, we detected substantial regional differences in key floral traits. Plants in central populations produced larger flowers with 68% greater herkogamy and had 30% more flowers open simultaneously than plants in northern populations. However, there was no regional difference in the mating system. In northern populations, 73% (range = 60–88%) of seeds were self‐fertilized compared to 76% (51–100%) in central populations. In both regions, adult inbreeding coefficients were near zero, indicating very strong inbreeding depression despite high selfing. Marked geographic variation in key floral traits does not reflect evolutionary differentiation in the mating system.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here