Premium
Implications of ITS sequences and RAPD markers for the taxonomy and biogeography of the Oxytropis campestris and O. arctica (Fabaceae) complexes in Alaska
Author(s) -
Jorgensen Janet L.,
Stehlik Ivana,
Brochmann Christian,
Conti Elena
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.3732/ajb.90.10.1470
Subject(s) - biology , polyphyly , rapd , internal transcribed spacer , biogeography , taxonomy (biology) , polyploid , taxon , evolutionary biology , fabaceae , botany , ecology , zoology , phylogenetics , ploidy , phylogenetic tree , genetic diversity , genetics , population , clade , demography , sociology , gene
Taxonomic consensus is lacking on the Oxytropis arctica and O. campestris species complexes, two polyploid complexes found in the interior and arctic areas of Alaska. One classification has emphasized flower size, whereas flower color is considered a key diagnostic character in another classification. Our analyses of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers provided no support for either classification system. The trees generated from ITS sequences and the phenogram derived from RAPD markers suggest that most recognized taxa in the two complexes are probably polyphyletic, including O. arctica var. barnebyana , which is listed as threatened in Alaska. The only consistent pattern detected by both types of molecular markers was a geographic split dividing the northeastern arctic populations from most other populations (48.60–55.03% in AMOVA analyses). This genetic subdivision probably reflects a Pleistocene barrier formed by the northern coastal ice shield. Our molecular data, in conjunction with the previously reported variation of ploidy levels in these groups, suggest a scenario of recent and multiple origins of polyploidy. It is possible that most Alaskan populations of these two complexes are best referred to as a single taxonomic species despite morphological differentiation within the complexes.