Premium
No association between plant mating system and geographic range overlap
Author(s) -
Grossenbacher Dena,
Briscoe Runquist Ryan D.,
Goldberg Emma E.,
Brandvain Yaniv
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.3732/ajb.1500078
Subject(s) - biology , outcrossing , mating system , range (aeronautics) , selfing , reproductive isolation , mating , evolutionary biology , ecology , taxon , sister group , genetic algorithm , clade , phylogenetics , genetics , population , demography , pollen , materials science , composite material , sociology , gene
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Automatic self‐fertilization may influence the geography of speciation, promote reproductive isolation between incipient species, and lead to ecological differentiation. As such, selfing taxa are predicted to co‐occur more often with their closest relatives than are outcrossing taxa. Despite suggestions that this pattern may be general, the extent to which mating system influences range overlap in close relatives has not been tested formally across a diverse group of plant species pairs. METHODS: We tested for a difference in range overlap between species pairs for which zero, one, or both species are selfers, using data from 98 sister species pairs in 20 genera across 15 flowering plant families. We also used divergence time estimates from time‐calibrated phylogenies to ask how range overlap changes with divergence time and whether this effect depends on mating system. KEY RESULTS: We found no evidence that automatic self‐fertilization influenced range overlap of closely related plant species. Sister pairs with more recent divergence times had modestly greater range overlap, but this effect did not depend on mating system. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of a strong influence of mating system on range overlap suggests that mating system plays a minor or inconsistent role compared with many other mechanisms potentially influencing the co‐occurrence of close relatives.