Premium
Within‐ and trans‐generational plasticity affects the opportunity for selection in barbed goatgrass ( Aegilops triuncialis )
Author(s) -
Espeland Erin K.,
Rice Kevin J.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.3732/ajb.1200372
Subject(s) - biology , dry weight , selection (genetic algorithm) , evolvability , transgenerational epigenetics , phenotypic plasticity , loam , agronomy , evolutionary biology , botany , ecology , genetics , gene , epigenetics , artificial intelligence , soil water , computer science
• Premise of the study: Environments are composed of selective agents, and environments may also modify the efficacy of these agents. Environments affect the rate of maximum evolutionary change by influencing variation in relative fitness (i.e., the opportunity for selection, or I ). Within‐ and transgenerational plastic environmental responses may affect I , speeding or slowing processes of local adaptation. • Methods: We determined whether environmental factors affected the opportunity for selection ( I ) in Aegilops triuncialis (barbed goatgrass) by measuring I as a within‐ and transgenerational plastic response to two maternal glasshouse environments (serpentine/dry and loam/moist). We also determined whether this species’ two most common genetic lineages (determined by DNA microsatellite length polymorphism) varied in response to glasshouse treatments. • Key Results: Opportunity for selection was less for plants grown in the dry serpentine environment than for plants grown in the moist loam environment. This response varied between genetic lineages. The east lineage exhibited a within‐generation response to the dry serpentine environment. For both seed mass and average seed weight in this lineage, the opportunity for selection was lower in dry serpentine than in moist loam. The west lineage had a transgenerational response to the dry serpentine such that the opportunity for selection for seed number and seed mass was lower for plants produced by mothers grown in dry serpentine than for plants produced by mothers in moist loam. • Conclusions: Phenotypic variation in relative fitness is constrained by the dry serpentine environment, which leads to lower evolvability in this environment. Within‐ and transgenerational effects of the environment may slow local adaptation to serpentine soils.